Ex-Samsung Researcher: CXMT Was Built to Steal Tech

Illustration of a blue-lit semiconductor cleanroom interior

Written by

in

As of August 19, 2026, a former Samsung Electronics researcher who was a founding member of Chinese DRAM maker CXMT (ChangXin Memory Technologies) has testified in court that the company aimed to absorb Samsung's chipmaking know-how from the moment it was established. The witness himself was already handed a stiff sentence in a separate trial for leaking Samsung technology.

1.6 trillion won (~$1.2B)Amount Samsung invested to develop the leaked 18nm DRAM process
618 stepsNumber of DRAM production process steps targeted in the leak
7 yearsPrison sentence handed to the former researcher in the first trial
No. 4 worldwideCXMT's ranking in global DRAM market share

Key points

  • Former Samsung Electronics researcher Jeon (56), a founding member of CXMT, testified as a witness at the Seoul Central District Court on August 11.
  • He testified that CXMT's management aimed from the outset to acquire Samsung's DRAM process know-how, without building its own R&D labs or production lines.
  • The leaked material reportedly covered 618 steps of the 18-nanometer DRAM process that Samsung spent 1.6 trillion won (about $1.2 billion) to develop.
  • Jeon was indicted for handing over the technology after moving to CXMT in 2016, and was sentenced to seven years in prison in a first-trial ruling this past April.

Startling testimony has emerged in the criminal trial over technology leaks from Samsung Electronics to Chinese chipmaker CXMT (ChangXin Memory Technologies). Jeon, 56, a former Samsung Electronics researcher who was among the company's founding members, took the stand on August 11 before the Seoul Central District Court's 32nd Criminal Division (Presiding Judge Ryu Kyung-jin) and testified that CXMT's leadership had planned from the very beginning to build its products by absorbing Samsung's technology. According to his account, the company had no independent research division or production facilities when it was founded, and showed no real intent to develop its own technology.

Jeon also testified that the company's internal reporting structure differed depending on employees' country of origin. He said staff complained internally that reports written by Taiwanese employees were accepted at face value, while material from Korean employees was routinely dismissed. The information at issue in this case reportedly contains core details on 618 individual steps involved in DRAM manufacturing.

Jeon himself is one of the defendants in the case. After 28 years at Samsung Electronics, he moved to CXMT in 2016 and was accused of illegally passing along information related to Samsung's 18-nanometer DRAM process — technology the company spent 1.6 trillion won (about $1.2 billion) to develop. He received a heavy seven-year prison sentence in his own first-trial ruling this past April. Notably, he did not disclose evidence of organized corporate involvement during his own trial but changed his account when testifying in a co-defendant's case, raising questions about whether he'll offer further testimony once his appeal begins.

Prosecutors, who have been investigating since 2024, have indicted roughly a dozen development staff, including Jeon, on charges including leaking core national technology overseas. They believe CXMT grew rapidly by recruiting former Samsung employees and absorbing core technology, and that this pipeline of expertise helped the company become the first Chinese firm to mass-produce 10-nanometer-class DRAM in 2023. As a result, within roughly a decade of its founding, the company climbed to fourth place worldwide in DRAM market share, behind Samsung Electronics and SK hynix.

Legal experts say that if this testimony is accepted as fact, it could serve as evidence for Samsung to pursue trade-secret claims. That's fueling talk of filing a complaint against CXMT with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), built on the record from Korea's domestic investigation and trial.

In Korea right nowIn Korea, attention is focused on how this testimony points to an organized, company-level effort to acquire technology rather than the actions of a lone individual. The semiconductor industry has long warned that if process information designated as core national technology leaks abroad, Korean firms' technological edge could narrow quickly — making the trial's outcome, the coming appeal, and the possibility of an ITC complaint the industry's next flashpoints to watch.

FAQ

What kind of company is CXMT?

It's China's largest DRAM manufacturer, which climbed to fourth place in global DRAM market share within roughly a decade of its founding, trailing only Samsung Electronics and SK hynix.

Why does this testimony matter?

It supports the idea that the Samsung technology leak may have been an organized, company-wide effort rather than an individual's actions — which could become grounds for future legal action.

What punishment did the witness, Jeon, receive?

He was sentenced to seven years in prison in a first-trial ruling this past April, and an appeal trial is expected to begin soon.

📎 원문 보기 · Sources

동아일보 기사 이미지Ex-Samsung Researcher: CXMT Was Built to Steal Tech동아일보 · Aug 19, 2026삼전 前직원 “中 CXMT, 설립때부터 삼성 기술 탈취 노려”Read the full story & photos at the source →
한국경제 기사 이미지Ex-Samsung Researcher: CXMT Was Built to Steal Tech한국경제 · Aug 18, 2026"中 CXMT 설립 때부터 삼성전자 D램 기술 탈취"Read the full story & photos at the source →

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *